With 1D and 3D simulations, costs can be reduced and efficiency increased. Through precise calculations, weak points can be identified at an early stage.
With the help of 1D simulation in Siemens Flomaster, complex pipe networks can be modelled and various operating scenarios can be investigated. The flow is simulated along the pipe axis (current thread theory), while pressure losses and energy distribution are calculated using empirical formulas.
The 1D simulation provides quick results for large pipe networks, but cannot depict local flow effects such as turbulence, turbulence or multiphase flows in detail. This is where 3D CFD simulation comes in.
A 1D simulation (e.g. with Flomaster) is particularly suitable for:
However, a 1D simulation is not suitable for detailed local flow effects, the presentation of turbulences or the optimization of geometries.
A 3D CFD simulation is ideal for:
However, 3D simulation is more complex and requires more computing time (hours to days). It is therefore particularly suitable for targeted analyses of specific problem areas.
The combination of both methods enables efficient and precise analysis. For example, critical points identified in a 1D simulation can be examined in more detail with a 3D simulation in order to optimize the geometry.
On the basis of isometrics, drawings and apparatus data, strength analyses can be carried out using the finite element method (FEM).
In addition to pipeline systems, FEM simulation can also be used to calculate and optimize steel structures, pressure vessels and special structures.
With FEM calculation, material savings can be achieved, weak points identified at an early stage and designs can be optimized in a targeted manner.
